Amnesigenic

“Just looking at a woman can be called sexual assault” is a ridiculous assertion, legally inaccurate and indicative that you’re either stupid or lying

Not helping your credibility

Cool numbers you got there

Cry about it

Lol try harder loser

Tattoo artists do not generally have their customers alone in an unmonitored vehicle with the ability to relocate them easily against their will, neither do masseuses or any of your other examples. Weak comparisons, weak argument.

Cry about it

There’s a big difference between saying that violent/sexual crimes committed by women are underreported and claiming that the gap in reporting would come anywhere close to making up the difference in rates of commission of these crimes between men and women, the former is verifiably true and the latter is extremely not verifiable and almost certainly not true

US crime statistics are unreliable specifically in regard to race due to the extremely well documented presence of organized white supremacist groups in US law enforcement and the judicial system, you might want to do some reading and rethink what you consider plausible before attempting to discuss the topic

Preferring not to be assaulted is not a choice, the reality that men are more likely to commit these crimes is also not a choice, and the fact that the specific scenario of driver and lone passenger is much higher risk is also extremely relevant. It would be nice if Uber cared enough to try screening their employees more carefully, but offloading cost and responsibility onto someone else is more profitable so I wouldn’t count on it happening any time soon. You could possibly find a statistic to support being a bigot, but it would definitely be bullshit. International crime statistics and legal & sociological analysis directly contradicts racially biased US crime stats, whereas they instead fully confirm this specific gender bias in crime stats. One is true, the others are not. Allowing women to make choices that affect their safety based on verifiable facts is entirely reasonable, I don’t particularly care if men find it discriminatory.

Cry about it

Just another famine in in a region with a long history of regularly occuring famines, and the areas affected were ethnically mixed with no evidence to suggest a target, so even if it were intentional it wouldn’t qualify as a genocide

Underreporting of sex crimes by male victims of male assailants might possibly skew the ratio slightly, but underreporting by male victims also applies to male assailants, available evidence overwhelmingly indicates that men are more likely to commit sex crimes and violent crimes, and unlike biased racial statistics there’s no evidence whatsoever for the same sort of individual and institutional motive to skew them. We have outright racists in law enforcement verifiably & deliberately targeting minority communities, we have no evidence to suggest similar for men vs women in regard to law enforcement/crime stats.

None of those scenarios puts the customer at greater risk of being a victim of a violent or sexual crime, none of them put the employee in question alone with the customer in an unmonitored vehicle, easy line to draw

We’re not discussing preference as in attraction, we’re discussing the preference of women customers for women drivers due to the significantly greater incidence of violence and sexual assault commited by men specifically towards women, which is also not a choice

Difference is the racially biased crime statistics produced in the US are the direct result of racially biased law enforcement and judicial systems, whereas the significantly higher rate of sex crimes and violence by men vs women is a verifiable fact substantiated by similar statistics in countries around the world. One is a lie, the other is not.

The gender “requirement” for strippers is based on customer preference, if Uber customers prefer a gender for drivers then the same is true here

Cry about it

You didn’t even spell it right lol, it’s literally the entire name of the linked article, and Wikipedia isn’t a source or a reliable aggregator of sources for anything remotely controversial

They’re right, cry about it