• 1 Post
  • 165 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 2nd, 2023

help-circle

  • For 40 days democrats did all they could, they refused to compromise. Today they broke that status quo. When you don’t have the votes and you don’t have the message, you have nothing. Dems have failed for 50 years to do what Republicans have of infiltrating all levels of government such as mayors, governors, and judges.

    There really isn’t much left for Dems to do except yell loudly, write loudly, or refuse to participate in the process. They’ve failed to get themselves in any strategic position to do anything else.

    We should all be mad and upset at them. Theyve failed to play the same game that the Republicans have won at. But short of physical altercations there is very little else Democrats can do







  • I’m not the op but Ill take a stab at their ask because I want something like this too.

    The idea is to have a list of tasks which autopopulate based on their time since last completed. Those tasks do not have a schedule due date on them, but a recurrence interval. When the task is marked as complete the system will hide that task until the designated time has elapsed.

    This means that when opening the app, you only see tasks that are “overdue” based on their interval coming back up. If I don’t complete the task today, it’s still there tomorrow. If I complete the task, it should not reappear until the interval is up, and that interval should not be dependent on the day the task was completed.

    Example task; water plants every 7 days. I want the app to tell me exactly 7 days after I last completed the task that it’s time to water the plants, regardless of whether it took me 3 days to complete the task.

    Would love to know if this exists already.





  • beetus@lemmy.worldtoRant@lemmy.sdf.orgA rant on left-wing online infighting
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    Maybe this puts us at a disadvantage but giving up our principles for a common goal is not really how this works.

    I struggle to square the statement in the scope of “democracy”. It reads like you don’t want to compromise to reach a solution at all. That’s not democracy. There will always be people who hold positions different to yours and one side is going to have to bend their principals to reach a compromise.

    I’m not asking you to accept any particular position here, but if we take a step back from the actual policies of our current time it sounds less like you want a democracy, a system where different views are blended together, and more like a system that only meets “your” views.

    Again not an attack on “you” but if everyone has this staunch viewpoint, how can we ever get to a workable system for all?



  • beetus@lemmy.worldtoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.worldGN will be President by 2035
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 days ago

    I don’t agree with the first but totally do the second. The Republican party fell in line and bridge divides across factions for the purpose of winning the government. Dems can’t seem to get past their ideological purity tests. Do you really think classic Republicans like maga? Fuck no they don’t, but they like winning and winning keeps them in power.

    You have to win to run a government and shape it how you please. Period.