• itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    Reports indicate it was a muted response to indicate an intention to deescalate. They had to do something but they didn’t go crazy. We’ll see, I guess.

  • venusaur@lemmy.worldBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Totally expected. What would be unexpected is firing at the country itself.

  • Hux@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    So far, reports state “fired at” but come up short of saying “hit”.

    Sounds like air defenses may have intercepted all of them? At least to the extent we can trust reporting at this stage.

    ngl, it’d be more satisfying to read about a successful counterstrike…

  • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Why not attack the U.S. directly? There are plenty of coastal bases in the U.S.

    I feel like it would hurt a whole lot more if they were to go after something on U.S. soil…not that I exactly want that. Being bombed at home sounds terrifying.

    Im just curious what the logic was behind this.

      • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        They do technically have orbital launch capability, which implies they in theory have the capacity to construct an ICBM, even if not with a nuclear warhead necessarily. Granted, the results of such a strike almost certainly would not be worth the costs to them so I’ve no expectation they’ll do such a thing, but they probably could if they wanted to badly enough.

    • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Perhaps because if they did that, there’s a very high chance trump would nuke them. He’s been itching for a reason to use nukes since his first term, and that would give him the excuse he wants.

      e: I think the fact I got 2 opposing comments (he’d do it without justification and he’d be stopped by the CoC even with justification) might be telling here. He’s a monkey with a machine gun, and who knows if justification would work on others in the chain of command? Perhaps they’d rather not risk that.

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      You are getting downvoted but i agree with you its obvious they dont really try to hurt the US.

      Even the missiles they did fire, ALL of them were intercepted by US missile defence and not a single person was hurt.

      Its just to show that they hit back a little symbolically.

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s pretty straightforward, they have to do something, but they really don’t want a war with the US despite any public comments. An attack that can be directly traced to Iran that even targeted the mainland would be a great way to ensure the US escalates.

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      The ONLY good point to this would be that it would draw the US public into action. A base in the Middle East got hit? People shrug it off, it’s nothing new and doesn’t affect them. A naval or army base on the East Coast gets a missile hit? At least if there was disagreement on what to do, we’d be arguing about it. Assuming that Iran can even get that far…

      And to be clear, it’s only a good point in that it would wake people up that shit isn’t right, and maybe they’d feel threatened enough for their own welfare to do something.

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Because these are short to medium range ground fired missiles? They don’t reach that far. Feel free to correct me if I’m wrong but I don’t think they have submarines that can get close and fire missiles at the United States proper.

    • OrganicMustard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      There hasn’t been a war on U.S. mainland in 150 years. If a misil hits it it could trigger easily WWIII. Last attack on U.S. was 9/11 and that started multiple wars.

    • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      There will be a “terrorist” attack in the near future. The something with guns during a crowded event. My money is on a 4th of July event shooting. Sadly that’s the only way Iran and other poor nations have to fight back. Until Iran and poor nations get nukes they will be taken advantage of. I’m pro Iran nukes simple because them not having them is obviously not working for anyone