• InputZero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yes but that’s expensive. It’s a lot cheaper to just draw from the municipal supply and discharge it.

        • ansiz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          I know politicians are spineless but the obvious solution seems to be to keep increasing the cost of using water until the data centers switched to a closed system. Don’t most nuclear power plants recycle most of the water they use?

          Charging the data centers more would also be a nice increase in revenue for the local municipal area

          • InputZero@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            In regards to nuclear power plants, the first and second loops are recycled constantly but the third loop can either be recycled or open loop. That’s why most nuclear power plants are built next to large bodies of water. They use the water from a lake, ocean, or whatever to do the last cooling step. It’s possible but it’s not as cheap as throwing away the warm water once you’re done with it with cheap cold water.

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Evaporative cooling is one option, yes, but not the only one. Do we know what method these data centers are actually using?