🍹Early to RISA 🧉@sh.itjust.worksM to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 25 天前Anon sees through the liesimagemessage-square107linkfedilinkarrow-up1412arrow-down14
arrow-up1408arrow-down1imageAnon sees through the lies🍹Early to RISA 🧉@sh.itjust.worksM to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 25 天前message-square107linkfedilink
minus-squareDigit@lemmy.wtflinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·24 天前I dont follow… How does limiting to 3 whys achieve homeostasis?
minus-square11111one11111@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·24 天前I just answer 1 why to every why cuz fucked if I know im only ever on here pooping and people do wirrd shit when they pooo
minus-square11111one11111@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·22 天前Na pretty sure this is where the off balance of homeostasis happens and the whys are the too much salt in the equation. My homeostasis reply only binds with thre initial why but has no relevance with the second layer of whys
minus-squareDigit@lemmy.wtflinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·20 天前I imagine this is similar to Socratic inquiry.
minus-squareDigit@lemmy.wtflinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·17 天前or the first Heidegger bit in https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jmNGeZbbV7I about the endless why
I dont follow…
How does limiting to 3 whys achieve homeostasis?
I just answer 1 why to every why cuz fucked if I know im only ever on here pooping and people do wirrd shit when they pooo
Why?
(Embrace the whyception)
Na pretty sure this is where the off balance of homeostasis happens and the whys are the too much salt in the equation. My homeostasis reply only binds with thre initial why but has no relevance with the second layer of whys
Why?
I imagine this is similar to Socratic inquiry.
or the first Heidegger bit in https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jmNGeZbbV7I about the endless why