• Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Bazzite is much worse for a new user then cachy. Worse documentation and a load of quirks from being immutable.

    Frankly they would be better off with mint unless they need very up to date hardware support for like a laptop.

    • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I installed CachyOS for a weekend and it’s now been several months. I love it.

      But I would never, ever recommend it to a new user. It still requires someone to be comfortable on the command line and it’s possible to break it if you don’t know what you’re doing.

      Bazzite just works. You install it and start logging into your accounts. It’s nearly impossible for a newcomer to break, and perfect for the vast majority of new Linux users.

      Recommending Cachy to new users hurts not only those users but the entire Linux ecosystem.

      I don’t recommend Mint, either, but only because I am a KDE cultist, I hate Cinnamon, and every time I’ve tried it on anything I’ve had frustrating hardware issues that I have never had on Fedora.

      I’m BlameTheAntifa and I have a distro-hopping addiction.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I’m BlameTheAntifa and I have a distro-hopping addiction.

        “Hi, BlameTheAntifa.” The circle of disto-hoppers echos.

      • Pat_Riot@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Guh, I’ve been running Mint for a couple of years now and the only thing I have had it not talk to was an obsolete audio interface.

    • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Bazzite is good for people who break their computer constantly because it’s harder to break. Cachy is better for people who can be trusted with sudo

      • Eyedust@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 hours ago

        This. I mained Arch for 2 years and still can’t be completely trusted with sudo. Moved to Nobara, would recommend as well. Its a bit more advanced, but you don’t have to touch the command line if you don’t want to and setup is right there step-by-step when you first boot.

        I did try Bazzite first. I just couldn’t get used to living the Flatpak life. I know you can force install native packages, but at that point why wouldn’t I just use Nobara, lol.

        • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Drag tried Bazzite last year and hated it for the same reason as you. Now drag’s on Cachy and loves it. Drag did accidentally break the swap file entry in fstab and dealt with months of slow booting and freezing, but drag accepts that as drag’s own fault and fixed it. If a user is good natured about fucking their computer up with sudo, cachy is a great OS, and most users won’t even do anything complicated enough to risk breaking their computer that bad. Bazzite is for users who can’t fix it or won’t accept it when they do something stupid with sudo.

          • Eyedust@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 minutes ago

            I agree. Too much handholding for me, imo. However, if I had a Steamdeck I might use it just for simplicity sake. If I wanted an immutable distro for my desktop I’d choose NixOS, tbh, but that’s on the opposite end of the complexity spectrum from Bazzite.