muhyb@programming.dev to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 3 months agoMoving out so found one of my older archives. You can guess how old it is.imagemessage-square79linkfedilinkarrow-up1243arrow-down12
arrow-up1241arrow-down1imageMoving out so found one of my older archives. You can guess how old it is.muhyb@programming.dev to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square79linkfedilink
minus-squareCarmakazi@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·3 months agoAren’t read-write disks fairly unstable from a longevity perspective?
minus-squareone_old_coder@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·3 months agoDefinitely from what I remember. They were used as some kind of floppy disks with more storage, but they sucked.
minus-squaremuhyb@programming.devOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·3 months agoUnless you use them only once, probably yes.
minus-squareosaerisxero@kbin.melroy.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up5·3 months agoThe fabled write-only system
minus-squaretomiant@piefed.socialBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·3 months agoOnly write. No read!
minus-squaretomiant@piefed.socialBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·3 months agoOk, now listen to this gif
Aren’t read-write disks fairly unstable from a longevity perspective?
Definitely from what I remember. They were used as some kind of floppy disks with more storage, but they sucked.
Unless you use them only once, probably yes.
The fabled write-only system
Only write. No read!
I like me stone tablets.
Ok, now listen to this gif