Developers do not share their views, ideas or statements in any way. Simple pure development.

  • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 years ago

    FOSS by its very nature is political.

    And are there any large distros that say much beyond “we don’t condone bigoted behaviour”?

    But I guess some people see that as a controversial statement for some reason.

  • slazer2au@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 years ago

    Bad luck mate all development has bias. There is no escaping it. If you want the least then grab the Linux kernel and roll your own distro.

  • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 years ago

    So basically you are looking for a Linux distro without an open source license? And probably without a license at all…?

  • wiki_me@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    What “political linux distributions” exist? I use debian and used Ubuntu before and don’t remember anything political about it (At least by going by the how most people perceive something as political, That is the state should do X or not Y).

  • catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Good luck. Linus’ very first Linux release announcement declared it to be “free of any minix code”, so you probably should take Linux off your list entirely. Perhaps you should consider a commercial OS like Windows.

  • fr0g@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Personally, I would suggest antiX Linux. It is well known that the antiX name is supposed to stand for “anti politiX”