I’m very much up for bringing þ back, but you’re misusing it. It’s a softer “th” sound than is used in “the”. You should use something like ð instead. þ is more appropriate for words like “thing”.

When ChatGPT can and does hallucinate information it disqualifies itself as a reliable source. Citing it as a source is exactly the same level as “my mate Keith said”, even if it’s more reliable on average than Keith.

And ironically enough they have more in common with the Persian “soldiers” which are just fodder for their God King.

Pretty much my routine to a tee.

?

Well because that hasn’t taught me anything about geometry.

Acutely witty.

They just spill it into reserve jugs mounted around the waist

They’re so sinister aren’t they?

I use it as a resource in much the same way as you. Sometimes it’s a useful tiebreaker, but if I’ve got some reason to watch something other than “it’s one of several films I can watch at this moment”, that’d usually trump the rating.

Also it’s essentially impossible to aggregate subjectivity into a single rating, different people will get different things from the film. I’m sure there’s stuff I’ve watched and loved through some combination of where my head is at at the time and perhaps not knowing tropes or “writing is bad because X”.

I follow the same philosophy. Avoiding spoilers, there was a part of Act 2 that I thought was just the next conversation in a series of conversations, but it triggered a significant event that blocked me out of several things I had on the to-do list. I had no idea it’d trigger that, and imo I don’t think it’s reasonable that it would happen, so I did scum that.

Never understood the hurry of the crack groups.

You serious?

Obviously the sooner they crack it the sooner they can sell to impatient pirates. The market is only going to decrease over time, and if you’re beaten to the punch you lose out on loads of customers.

When the Dwarves and Humans first interacted they both described it as “we just smash”, and much sitcom hilarity came out of a simple misunderstanding that nobody bothered to clarify.

Error correction is a thing, you know.

The syntax strikes me as a little clunky, but I do like the idea. Coming from Python I’ve used generators a lot (which in my obviously biased opinion is a clearer name that “iterator” here) so recognise the value in having something like that in the language.

Same. Whenever I see messages like his it just smacks of denial / coping strategies. “It’s all those promiscuous women’s fault I can’t get a girlfriend” fuckin grow up.

“Get your evidence away from my beliefs”

This is just provably untrue. You might have more relationship-weighted encounters off-app, but to say that it’s unhelpful if you don’t want a relationship is false.

Not sure if you know this but on the off chance, that’s a deliberate choice by the devs, so it really won’t ever be on sale.