
This is just aggressive ignorance. It’s not a matter of opinion or dependent on ideology. It’s basic history and terminology.
an Iranian Monarch and Iranian Supreme Leader are just different titles for two different authoritarian Regimes
Precisely. They are different words which refer to different regimes (separated by a revolution). If you use them interchangeably you will confuse people.

Show me literally anyone else who refers to the Ayatollah as the Shah. Do an image search for “Shah of Iran” and look at the results.
Xi and Mao are/were leaders of the same regime (The PRC), so that comparison actually makes sense. What you’re doing is the equivalent of saying the emperor of China is the same as the president of the People’s Republic of China.






























Genghis Khan and Hitler were both authoritarians that had people killed over dissent.
Therefore, Genghis Khan invaded Poland in 1939 and put European Jews in concentration camps. They are identical.
I’m not talking about moral equivalence! You used the wrong term for the current head of state of Iran. Just learn and move forward, and stop acting like an arrogant ass when corrected.
I’m sorry if I sounded smug when I called out your initial error.