• 106 Posts
  • 4.39K Comments
Joined 2 年前
cake
Cake day: 2023年6月12日

help-circle
  • Rarely as a kid, but I pushed for adult discussions when I got older because otherwise I would never talk to them and it was clear they wanted to talk to me.

    They only wanted to talk about inconsequential things, which is boring so no thanks.

    So whenever I talked to my mom or dad after like 25 or something, I resolved to only talk about things I was actually interested in, and to cut short in consequential conversations and steer back to interesting topics, things I normally didn’t talk to my parents about (drugs, relationships, philosophy), and eventually one topic or another got their attention (my mom told me about smoking pot in high school), and I continue trying to be as honest as I could with them because I don’t want a relationship with someone comprised entirely of small talk, but I don’t want to ignore my parents either.

    I definitely think there’s a correlation between how you’re brought up and your relationship with your parents now, my parents implicitly taught me not to bring up consequential life topics to them as a child, and I had to recognize and actively fight against that terrible lesson as an adult in order to have any sort of mature, human relationship with either of them.


  • Because, as the article states, many countries have been trying to control the weather for decades with varying success.

    Use the term “modify” instead of “control” if you like, but pretending that countries aren’t trying to control the weather is exactly why conspiracy theorists gain legitimacy and many journalists lose credibility.

    The point of the article is that technically, technically, conspiracy theorists could be wrong about weather control if we struggle to split hairs about what “weather control” is, but telling ourselves stories to deny reality is the same problem that “conspiracy theorists” have.

    If you deny a historical, documented conspiracy(secret plan) that took place, you lack credibility the same as a theorist without evidence. Conspiracies are real, they are secret plans, and they have definable limits like everything other plan that exists.

    “Yes, there was a secret plan to seed rainclouds.” That secret plan was a conspiracy to control the weather.

    No, that conspiracy did not result in a super cyclone, there’s no evidence for seeding rainclouds having the ability to lead to a super cyclone. Anyone who asserts that is incorrect according to the available evidence.

    Conspiracies to control weather still happened.

    Facts defined by reasonable accuracy.








  • This “benchmark”, gdpval, does not at all evaluate the effective real-world use of ai across 44 occupations.

    Lawyers, police/detective supervisors, social workers are some of those jobs “evaluated”, jobs which we know ai currently hallucinate datasets and context for

    "GDPval is an early step that doesn’t reflect the full nuance of many economic tasks. While it spans 44 occupations and hundreds of knowledge work tasks, it is limited to one-shot evaluations, so it doesn’t capture cases where a model would need to build context or improve through multiple drafts. "

    Openai uses expertly constructed and meticulously crafted questions suitable to ai and tests a single job task a single time specifically to avoid the problem of low ai accuracy and consistency.

    Gdpval doesn’t even grade those 44 jobs, it grades a single task within one of those jobs and then extrapolates that single task “success” as proficiency across an entire occupation.

    This is more “despite the contrary evidence of real-world data, if you let openai cherrypick data within extremely constrained question-response conditions, it is possible to view single, non-holistic, hypothetical answers as a success of ai”.

    or

    “If you pretend our limited, invalid data is comprehensive and valid, then you can pretend our ai is successful.”





  • Varyk@sh.itjust.workstoComic Strips@lemmy.worldAging 🫠
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 个月前

    that’s really interesting. I listened to a podcast with one of the writers, or maybe the creator, I can’t remember right now, and he talked about how sincere everybody was about creating the superhero who could actually change the cultural lack of concern about climate change.

    and what’s super cool is like statistically and culturally, it looks like the show worked.

    like yeah everything is still fucked, but it would have been way worse a generation earlier if a bunch of awesome nerds didn’t make Captain planet for generation x so they would become horrified over climate change.

    [here it is] (https://share.google/H4LaAuoFDf6AS01Al)










  • I’m with you, Mario 64 is one of my all time favorites.

    i still play it every few years and sometimes I’ll get the urge to watch the latest world-record speedrun, it’s so much fun to even just watch.

    pretty much the only game i do that with.

    great screenshots too. there are so many mods for SM64 but I almost always play vanilla, so it’s fun to see you guys as different characters.

    SM64 Toad is a psychopath for sure.

    congrats on getting to share the game with your friend, and almost hitting a year with your screenshots!