I’m not familiar but since more or less the same thinking gets applied to Stalin, Trump, and Putin, I believe it

there’s only so many ways to influence human brains and people tend to independently invent the good ones

“Kirk, who had begun to turn against Israel and refused approaches from Israel lobbyists just before his death”

hell of an opening sentence there i can see what The Canary Dot Co is implying but uh seems a little irresponsible

“greatest ally” is used exclusively by the absolute farthest right internet assholes btw. lets just agree to identify these things and keep them out

if we deny genocide joe a victory in minnesota again, we will get an even better result than the last time we did that

the sheer volume of absolute garbage posts attempting to de facto support actual fascism from The Usual Guys and some sock puppet accounts lately

it is almost as if there is a consequential upcoming event they would like to affect for the worse

caption is a classic yourjokebutworse addition

degenerate

look, I see a word that suggests a particular type of guy, I make the face, that’s just a thing you need to accept

i thought they were occupied by nato and the Good Guys were on a special operation to liberate them

“it didn’t happen and also I want it to happen again” shit

but to think “she” isn’t real scares me too…

why tho, that seems the least scary option

look just from this post I can tell you have some ability to be conscious of the difference between your fastest and most thoughtless reaction vs a thought that is more productive

so that’s good

perhaps scaling that up a bit would be even more helpful

or you could vote on policy instead of “this person is just like meeeeeeee” which is notheing but marketing scam nonsense for suckers

can’t wait to see which candidate enjoys the county fair the most

the answer that involves the least amount of conspiracies is that a guy accustomed to partying as hard as physically possible as a coping mechanism 100% of the time looked at his future (life in prison, no coping mechanisms available) and just took the only exit, and he was able to do this because fancy expensive prison for rich people halfassed procedure to make the fancy rich prisoners comfy

an answer that involves slightly more conspiracies is above, but someone else made some phone calls to arrange for the conditions that allowed him to do it unnoticed, to stop him from testifying (0 evidence of this)

“oh but actually John Hitman tunneled in through the airvents and strangled him” no, stupid, stop, bad

progressives love being ineffective

maybe don’t

is there somewhere I can read more about this, first I’ve heard about it

perhaps receiving billions of false alarms per second will have some sort of negative outcome re: the occasional non false alarm mixed in

every post ive seen from this dude has been /pol/ level shit about islam, he’s branching out into other zealotry of the convert nonsense now

[>]I need something that can be understood on a personal level as some of my friends are deeply cynical and have no concern about escaping techno-feudalism and surveillance

[>]every comment is about privacy or evil business guys

additionally, yes people have just stalled by talking, prior to the period we dropped the requirement for them to do that. most famously

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strom_Thurmond_filibuster_of_the_Civil_Rights_Act_of_1957

assuming US Senate: bills need 51 votes to pass, but by senate rules, the actual vote doesn’t happen until the debate period ends. because of this, historically, one person could simply stall the vote forever by talking, because the vote can’t happen until they finish. 60 senators can vote to end debate, and if the bill has 60 supporters, it’s going to get 51 votes in the actual vote for obvious math reasons. for reasons nobody really understands, the actual requirement for someone to talk got removed; now any senator can say “i declare neverending debate” and stop the vote from happening unless the other team has 60.

this dude found out that the moon landing was an american public relations operation and concluded that the moon must not be real