Anyone reaching for powerQuery in excel should not, and instead be reaching for something like PowerBI.

None of those positions are expected to know VBA script either.

Old isn’t necessarily bad, unless years of decision-making have left it in a massively complex state (see also: Xorg)

The real reason here is that LibreOffice is written in C++, which is falling rapidly out of fashion for modern apps, leading to a smaller supply of developers.

Contrast this with Onlyoffice. Yes, the document engine is still written in C++, however the build tools use more modern items like python and onlyoffice supports having Javascript frontends and scripting, making it easier to source web devs to work on these parts.

Starlink devices are currently the only approved ones.

Maybe the article is not biased, maybe, just maybe, the tech deserves this huge backlash because it is trash and nobody asked for it, not even game devs, or whatever you call people who make games but their games are not in need for this tech

If you can’t recognize bias in an obviously biased article, then your media literacy skills need work so that you can recognize different types of bias.

Hell even the current popular LLM’s, which are glorified statistics chat bots, can see this pattern and identify heavily statistical traits of bias in this article.

If you bother reading the article, you’ll note that the majority of developers interviewed are not people who would need this technology to begin with. Like all technologies, it is a choice to integrate it.

This article selected specifically for voices that were already against it/had no need for it.

Whether the tech is good or bad is irrelevant, because the article is horribly biased in one direction.

ok so I asked you to list precisely what game devs they interviewed and you gave me nothing.

Thanks for confirming you cannot parse the article of specific info.

Yeah. Did you read it? I did. Tell me what you understood from the article you read on the precisely WHO was interviewed, because I have doubts on your reading comprehension.

Commit history literally exists, you can go back to the commit prior to changing the license and fork it. Do you understand git in the slightest?

you don’t have a point, there is nothing to discuss,

Nice assumption, too bad its wrong.

Remind me again exactly who was interviewed in this article and what roles they have in?

This is such a braindead take that completely misses my original point. I know reading levels have dropped globally but come on now, you can do better.

It can also be forked at any time from the commit prior.

“we interviewed only haters and they all of them complained about the thing they hate”

What a garbage article.

OpenAI could direct anyone working at Astral to insert whatever they want

This would be suicidal for the project if it ignores the community. the project would instantly risk forking and OpenAI losing the ability to influence the ecosystem direction.

to your second point on needing contributors and infrastructor after a fork, while this is true, uv specifically has seen MASSIVE adoption both for hobbyists AND corporate interests. it has greatly simplified the overall python packaging experience. I would not be shocked if other corps began supporting a community fork if the main project went off the rails.

Bun, another open source project, has been doing just fine under Anthropic nearly a year later. Until there is more concrete info on the direction this will take, the fear is MASSIVELY overblown. uv is quickly starting to hit critical mass adoption and may be too important for it to end up in a dumpster.

Yeah it is gaslighting yourself. I get Openai isn’t great, but uv is open source.

Explain to me in great detail what exactly you think is going to happen here.

Also Bun, which was acquired by anthropic, is doing just fine as an open source project.

Too late for what exactly? Describe in actual detail.

You said it yourself, it’s open source so why are you running from it? The code is and will continue to be there in the open.

Don’t gaslight yourself. uv is open source and will not kill your grandmother. They just happon to be funded via Openai for now under their umbrella.

No you don’t, don’t be stupid. uv is open source, and this just funds that project. Don’t gaslight yourself.

UV is open source.

Dont gaslight yourself thinking it’s suddenly going to kill your grandmother now or something.

This just pure fearmongering and FUD.

Calm yourself.