Alkaline water plus citric acid does not make a buffer solution. And even if it did, it has absolutely no impact on your body when drinking it regardless.
If I wanted an AI answer I could’ve used the shitty website myself, why do you think anybody would be interested in your poorly formatted AI output?
I don’t follow the AI bubble trend at all. But I have been seeing alot of videos all of a sudden, popping up in my recommended talking about it. Who knows.
A few banks started issuing warnings, and some of the “biggest upcoming launches” were extremely underwhelming, like Sora 2 and GPT 5. Not only that, but the companies going all in on replacing workers with AI are still not showing a clear return on investment, so this combination is making people more aware about the bubble.
That’s where you fit your iPod
Nicely written comment bro, you look marvelous today
So you can’t provide any examples? Got it.
Oh sure! People don’t crave the system, Mastodon is just bad!
Hey, what’s the non-corporate alternative to a service that took over the world with consumers then? I mean, if the system is not the problem and people just hate Mastodon in particular, I’m sure you’ll have plenty of examples to share.
Firefox lost me after they snuck ai bullshit into the browser
I hate AI and refuse to interact with it. Your statement is false. They didn’t sneak anything in - they openly added a feature that lets you connect an AI assistant of choice, or with a single click, disable it entirely.
Unless they start embedding the ads directly into the video stream, they’ll never be able to block adblocks - updating your extensions will work.
maybe it will prop up PeerTube for once…
It won’t. Look at Mastodon vs Bluesky and Threads. Mastodon already existed, already worked well, had more features and was federated. People still chose Bluesky, which is just Twitter 2.0 owned by the same corporate douchebags.
People CRAVE the system.
Linux is the giant it is using email as the primary infrastructure for development. We will be fine.
you will not be able to visit the US.
That’s fantastic news, so I win and keep winning in that case. Great, no age verification on my software.
“1000x faster?” Learn to lie better
Analogue computers are indeed capable of doing a task 1000x faster than a regular computer. The difference is they do only that task, in a very specific way, and with one specific type of output. You can 3D print at home an “analogue computer” that can solve calculus equations, it can technically be faster than a CPU, but that’s the only thing it can do, it’s complex, and the output is a drawing on paper.
If you come up with a repeatable and precise set of mechanical movements that are analogous to the problem you want to solve, you can indeed come up with headlines like that.
Slippery slope fallacy
That’s not the slippery slope fallacy. Are you operating under the assumption that any sequence of events and projection of a future step is an example of the slippery slope fallacy?
Honestly this doesn’t seem that bad to me
A state governor doesn’t get to decide what kind of data libre software must or must not collect.
So a developer of a FOSS application that gets installed on a device on California
would make the developer subject to this.
And they’re going to do what exactly to a developer that doesn’t live in California? I won’t add any kind of age verification to my bioinformatics projects and I’ll keep issuing releases. Are they going to nuke Brazil? Block GitHub in California?
Unitedstatians are so absolutely alienated by their insane two party system that they quite literally operate under the assumption that if somebody opposes the “bad party” in one aspect, they immediately and totally fall into “good party” territory. Then they act shocked when turns out both are just right wing rich assholes, but one changes their profile picture on pride month or something. Repeat endlessly.
Mandatory os-level
Cute attempt, but libre software - as always - remains superior and impossible to control. That’s by design. Write any law you want, I can modify whatever line of code implements this stupid check, remove it, and move on.
They already are. So many user complaints on popular packages have nothing to do with a bug on the package, but are caused by the moronic permissions systems used by Flatpaks and similar.
Compared to “6, 7” it’s creative enough