Because for some piracy isn’t simply about being a cheapskate but also about activism
- 1 Post
- 6 Comments
lich_hegemon@lemmy.worldto
Technology@lemmy.world•These are the privacy permissions that you grant for Meta's new twitter competitorEnglish
2·3 years agoIf people want to crawl back into Meta’s clutches I’m not going to stop them. Don’t give the one nice thing we have to a corporation that only wants to exploit us.
lich_hegemon@lemmy.worldto
Malicious Compliance@lemmy.world•/r/interestingasfuck forced open, lowers its standard of what qualifies as "interesting", gets flooded with adult content [NSFW within two clicks]English
1·3 years agoThey don’t want to deal with the legal implications of it. Spez has said ad nauseum that they don’t want to risk 3PA providing NSFW content to users that Reddit is not allowed to serve because they don’t want to be held responsible for that. Especially now that some US states are requiring actual ID verification for 18+ content.
While Spez is a lying weasel, I don’t doubt that Reddit is worried about NSFW-related lawsuits, bad press, and ad revenue impact.
And, the next step after having control of the content is to further restrict it.
Political compasses are stupid anyway.
It’s a political torus. Walk of one end and you end up in the other
lich_hegemon@lemmy.worldto
Malicious Compliance@lemmy.world•Reddit: open /r/pics or else. Mods: OK but you didn't say howEnglish
0·3 years agoLet’s assume that everyone who upvoted their option also downvoted the alternative.
The group A, has |A| number of individuals. Group B has |B| number.
Option A: |A| - |B| Option B: |B| - |A| Option A = |A| - |B| = -(-(|A| - |B|)) = -(|B| - |A|) = -Option BThe results would be opposites of each other and would highlight the opinion of the majority anyway.



They have done so already for a few subs where a few of the mods were willing to budge. In others, all mods were removed and the subs were made restricted.