This would have been a (if not the only) good point to make in the article considering the title. But I guess this would have taken space away from ads

The headline is vert clickbaity : it does not affect VPN users (the law forbids age-gated websites from promoting VPNs as a circumvention), and the whole article is just an ad for VPNs

Here is a link to the adjust.h GitHub in case you don’t feel like watching a video

Is this some kind of virt-manager but with a TUI ?

I’m using the latest firefox on the latest android (just tried it on chrome from the same phone and it loads fine)

It looks really interesting but the link is giving me an SSL error :/

https://github.com/atuinsh/atuin is a great tool to manage and search your shell history. I especially enjoy it being able to search commands based on the working directory I was in when I ran them.

It also has more features (which I don’t use) to manage dotfiles and sync shell history across hosts/devices.

deleted by creator

I had one such case recently, turned out it was due to a faulty SATA (data) cable. Once you find which drive is clicking, try plugging it with a new cable before declaring it dead.

dmesg output may contain some useful error messages. If you find errors related to I/O, block devices, SCSI or SATA, you should include them in your post

Someone registering the domain would be able to receive any email sent to any address under this domain, including password resets.

https://inti.io/p/when-privacy-expires-how-i-got-access

There is no such software (that works kind of reliably). I’d love to be proven wrong, but I’ve looked into it enough that I’m quite confident it does not exist

I see both mastodon and lemmy

How about putting it at the top of the article, or using the dedicated “editor’s note” button they put right below the title ?

Found it thanks

Why did they burry what’s arguably the most important piece of information at the very end though ?

I’m not seeing this editor’s note (at least on mobile). Where is it ?

Edit 2: never mind, found it

How reliable is this website ? I see clickbaity headlines from it all the time around here and the Wikipedia page is mostly empty

I’m not seeing a picture, and even then, we would not be able to give any insight from a picture alone

First, your post is probably missing a link so we don’t have any context on what you’re asking (even if we can guess some stuff from the post text)

Second, you mention a website being sketchy/a honeypot without providing any technical reason to believe so

Third, this has nothing to do with computer security (maybe more of a privacy issue), and it does not look like a news piece, so this is definitely the wrong community

I roughly agree with everythibg you said, but this is a “Reddit” community after all. What did you expect when you subscribed to it ?

Reminds me of the time when I bind mounted my home dir in a chroot, then rm -rfed the chroot when I no longer needed it…