podian

Ah yes, always the people you’d most expect.

Booo censorship. 😂

I believe you’ve misinterpreted hitmyspot’s comment. If you think it’s worthwhile, perhaps you can describe exactly what the comparison is between, just so we’re operating on the same concepts so as to be on the same page.

I don’t think it’s worth arguing for arguing’s sake. So at the very least I hope to understand what distinctions you’ve made. If whatever it is is wholly subjective as you say then why refute the other person’s subjective view? What could make theirs more wrong or less valid than yours? 🤔

(I’m continuing to ask in the assumption that there is some shared basis in values or whatever that can make it a bit objective or intersubjective.)

I think we potentially can based on the proportion of people living in terminal pain and suffering – extra sanity damage the cause was easily preventable. If an overwhelming majority choose euthanasia or some sort of dignified pass, it’d be blatantly naive and foolish to continue to claim they’re incomparable. So, it can be a research question 😂.

Not to mention the disproportionate chance of catching an easily preventable disease and then being in extreme pain and misery for whatever remains of life. Normally I’d say that it’s a tragedy not to have the opportunity to live a long and full life and it should be avoided at all costs, but that was never realistically in the cards for them anyway with those kinda parents/cultural upbringing. Lottery odds aren’t worth it.

All of them. All of them are remarkable. Don’t let a single one get away.

Any chance that most of our politicians are replaced by magic 8-balls of similar efficacy but 0 cost?

“to ensure that the child and citizen parent have some demonstrated opportunity to develop… a relationship… that consists of the real, everyday ties that provide a connection between child and citizen parent and, in turn, the United States”

Huh… The child in this case became a US permanent resident at the age of 6. Is that not enough for an implied connection with the country? So much yikes with this ruling. Then again what else can be expected in a 5-4 Republican majority splot.

deleted by creator

Ah yes, any friends of her enemy (the Alberta public) is her enemy too.

That’s the best thing about representative and not direct democracy: you can do the right thing, e.g. pass correct legislation or policies even if it’s not popular. Instead they do the opposite. Maybe some day the majority of Canadians will come to grips with how our democracy is mostly just a thinly veiled oligopoly. As a BCer it’s probably further away for us than the other provinces.

There’s only 408 of em? No? These are rookie numbers then.

Some cops don’t seem to have gotten the message yet that the system needs to be blunt and dehumanizing. It’ll gladly cannabalize its own to get that message across.

And also, ACAB.

Fr. Wish he’d elaborate beyond platitudes and allegory too but we’re all just a doting audience. 🙄

Any chance that > $12.4B is directly taxed or siphoned from the big grocery chains?

Of all the lowlifes in the world, being a Zionist might very well be rock bottom.

Doctors With One Border

Another thing to add to Israel’s rap sheet

I think you’re mistaking “investigation” with “prosecution” or something else. The cops can investigate literally anyone. You can hire a PI to investigate anyone.

There are limits however on what investigative actions can be legally taken by cops based on the evidence they have. Even with no evidence, they can still do things like interview people who know the POI, even follow them around in public. They can’t, for example, detain them and beat a confession out of them, or search their house willy nilly.

No shade to Eby but it doesn’t take a lawyer to understand that water is wet.

Since he’s a lawyer though, he should know there’s more than enough to convict them of attempted treason, conspiracy, or any other inchoate crime thereof. Unfortunately it looks like neither provincial nor federal prosecutors will go after them for it.

TBF, it is a fundamentally woke goal to allow everyone, including poor people, fair and uncontrolled access to information.

Should really be a basic right but what do I know.