Fun fact (in the US): AI water usage pales in comparison to the amount of water wasted on CORN to produce ethanol.
Abolish ethanol. Embrace the renewable revolution!
Source: https://youtu.be/H_c6MWk7PQc
Fun fact (in the US): AI water usage pales in comparison to the amount of water wasted on CORN to produce ethanol.
Abolish ethanol. Embrace the renewable revolution!
Source: https://youtu.be/H_c6MWk7PQc
This is incredible. It’s works just like climate change stuff! Sure, burning gas with a car produces CO2, but then it floats away and it’s “not your problem”! Carbon dioxide? More like carbon-BYE!-oxide!


Is there a Lemmy community for “BrandNewSentence” where this can be cross posted? Because this sentence is definitely unique! Good grief, the cognitive dissonance is too damn high.


Dave is amazing, and his content on YouTube is very entertaining. This is a pragmatic answer for those who want or need Windows in some capacity, and then want to go on a use local accounts. Have some decency and recognize good advice when you see it.
ISO 8601 is the only true answer.
Should’a bought a Speed Queen
I really like checking these myself to make sure it’s true. I WAS NOT DISAPPOINTED!
(Total Rs is 8. But the LOGIC ChatGPT pulls out is ……. remarkable!)



Nothing prevents you from putting a call to “main()” in the global scope


If it works, is it really broken? Just add more screws.


Honestly, I can’t distinguish the colors


Sure, important metric. But can you please choose better fucking colors for the graph?


Unequivocal proof that it’s trained on human behavior


That’s what Xi said.


$20 says it’s all AI bots 🥲


If their customers are going to have to get used to not owning games they paid for, I guess Ubisoft is going to get used to not having money 🤷🏻


Commence operation “find out”!


It’s for the extra helpful documentation. You see, in this fantastic example, after the author set GLFW_TRUE to 1, he explained the deep and profound meaning of the value. This exemplifies that the number 1 can also be written as a word: “One”! Some people might be able to figure this out, but the author clearly went above and beyond to make the code accessible to the open source community, encouraging contributions from anyone who’s considering improving the code. Furthermore, this follows the long held tradition of man pages - explaining the nuance of the code, in preparation for telling others to RTFM when they arrogantly ask a question.
Say it with me!
A 👏 social 👏 security 👏 number 👏 is 👏 NOT 👏 a 👏 valid 👏 identity 👏 verification 👏 method.
The idea that all SSNs should be changed is dumb.
The fix is to get dumb people to stop using it as an identity verification method.