1. From the way you use the word, it’s clear you don’t know what enshittification means
2. You sound like the kind of person who dislikes anything that’s too popular. Chill

While I believe that nobody should be able to wield that much wealth in the first place, arguably being a world-famous artist is among the least unethical ways to become rich as long as the artistic work isn’t bought from ghostwriters. It takes $10 in net profit from 100m fans to make a billion, and I could easily imagine a sizable crowd of her followers genuinely wanting to give her money like that (whereas, for example, I never would have willingly agreed to give Nestlé’s leadership money, even when I used to buy their brands still).

I don’t care about her specifically, but from a “owning the fruits of your own labor” perspective, I think it makes sense for the art itself to be a big part of that.

deleted by creator

Because I’m just interpreting the statement as it was written while you are reading an additional argument into it that the comment plainly does not make. I suggest you brush up on argumentation theory if that is too difficult for you to understand

The statement I was addressing was where they were called “exactly the same.”

You are the one misinterpreting a statement here, by insinuating that the OP’s assertion of “exactly the same” was referring to Russia and US as a whole. It wasn’t, and so the point you’re arguing against is one that OP never made.

You’re arguing as if they had said Russia and the US are morally the same; what they actually said was that they are guilty of the same aforementioned crimes.

The [US] is actively and purposefully destabilising multiple countries and are basically terrorists at this point

Tell me how that sentence is wrong.

Are you basing this rant on your personal (anecdotal) experience of it working out for you, or actual statistics?

…Haley supports a nationwide abortion ban and can’t remember what the civil war was about. Reasonable‽

Imagine if you broke down

soo just another Tuesday? 🥲

It will happen, probably in weeks to months.

in the next few years, like, very few

Now who’s moving the goalposts…?

Removed by mod

Even “down time” doesnt really feel like down time because I am stuck between either boredom, working on yet another thing or thinking about things in general.

Oh man, I feel this so much. Most of my hobbies are somewhat work-like so while I enjoy them, they’re not really relaxing. And I can’t really “do nothing”

Ich habe Ende letzten Jahres mein Studium abgeschlossen und arbeite jetzt seit einem Monat in Vollzeit. Wenn ich mir anschaue, wie viel ich aufgabenmäßig zu tun habe, ist es gar nicht so viel mehr als vorher, aber irgendwie habe ich mich an die 40-Stunden-Woche immer noch nicht gewöhnt.

Eigentlich ist mein Job so entspannt wie es nur geht– ich mag die Arbeit wirklich gern, ich kann dreimal die Woche von zu Hause arbeiten und die Arbeitszeit wird nicht einmal kontrolliert. Trotzdem sträubt sich mein ADHS-verseuchtes Hirn immer noch gegen die Idee, die Hälfte meiner Zeit an Wochentagen mit Aufgaben zu verbringen, die ich mir nicht selbst ausgesucht habe. Und an den Tagen, an denen ich im Büro bin, habe ich hinterher keine wirkliche Energie mehr für meine Hobbyprojekte, die ich eigentlich furchtbar gerne wieder aufgreifen würde.

Ich bin sicher, das wird sich einpendeln. Aber jetzt gerade fühlt es sich noch sehr eingeengt an.

Liest sich wie von ChatGPT geschrieben. Viel zu viel “ich hoffe” und andere Besänftigungsfloskeln

Foolish me for thinking no-one could possibly need an /s on that comment.

I got the sarcasm, but this particular point is – as you’ve demonstrated very clearly in your response – the actual message you’re trying to push.

Or did you not know that highly addictive amphetamines is a commonly prescribed for ADHD?

You’re using “highly addictive” to insinuate that this is just a ludicrous and fundamentally flawed practice. No concern towards all of those who do have ADHD who report that medication has helped them live a life otherwise inaccessible to them. It’s highly stigmatizing framing and just because you have a valid point about opioids does not mean you get to dismiss genuine mental health struggles as having fallen prey to a marketing scheme.

the real breakthrough has been convincing everyone that they have some sort of mental health issue that requires pharmaceuticals. The entire country is taking something, and that’s been a huge help in keeping people docile.

I was with you up until that point. You point out that the poor are made to fight each other and then you engage in a fight against the disadvantaged who need medical assistance? Fuck this science denying, ableist bullshit.

Considering you asked it to follow a rule that does not exist, it’s unsurprising it can’t do it “correctly”

Die externen Quellen sind aber größtenteils original deutschsprachig, d.h. möglicherweise aus der Suche nach einem Wort äquivalent zu Verschlimmbesserung entstanden

I haven’t read it but it’s a terrible idea.

“Yeah sure I don’t know what I’m talking about, but here’s my strong opinion anyways”

Hab ich da etwa “human shields” gehört? Na aber die zu treffen ist ja auch legitim, zumindest ist das die offizielle deutsche Position…