Why didn’t it succeed?

Concorde flights came to a screeching halt after only 27 years of operation on October 24, 2003. The reason? Excessive cost, high fares, and loud noise. On a regular flight, Concordes consumed 6,771 gallons of fuel, which quickly exceeded the profit made from the flight. In addition to that, only a total of 20 Concordes were built and no airline ordered them except for Air France and British Airways, who had to as they were state-run airlines at the time.

Oh, and a 2000 crash that killed everyone on board (109 people) and four people on the ground.

    • FundMECFS@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah, until they flew over your house. If you think living near an airport is bad these days…. Concorde begs to differ

      • madcaesar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 months ago

        I never understood why they could not just go slow until they got up to cruising altitude and then gun it, wouldn’t that solve the sound problem?

        • Zorque@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          5 months ago

          Weren’t they basically horribly inefficient at slower speeds? That’s how I understand most supersonic craft to be. In order to maximize their efficiency at their intended cruising speed, they sacrifice efficiency at slower speeds. Spend too much time at those lower speeds you end up not having enough fuel to get to your destination.

          • EtherWhack@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            5 months ago

            That may be true, but don’t forget about the aerodynamics. They have smaller, swept wings to lower any drag and to provide the proper lift at cruising speed.

            At slow speeds they likely have the ailerons cranked near maxlift, just to stay aloft. (This likely causes or at least contributes to the fuel inefficiency, due to the increased drag.)

        • Redredme@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 months ago

          It’s the whole “I’ll fall out of the sky if I go any slower with this delta wing” thing.

          To create enough lift on a smaller wing you’ll have to go fast. A delta wing (v shape at the back) like on the Concord and almost all fighterjets makes it easier to go fast. They just suck at going slow.

          Add to that the " go faster!" Engines and you’ll get a very loud plane.

          A Concorde was for all intents and purposes just a very large fighterjet.

    • sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 months ago

      Museum of flight has one you can go it (not just a TIL, but also in a museum!). It is pretty cool and worth checking out if you are in the area.

  • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    162
    ·
    5 months ago

    No post on here has ever made me feel older. Just the thought that somebody might not know about Concorde because it’s so far in the past makes me want to hide in a closet.

    • suigenerix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      5 months ago

      IKR. I was in a costume hire shop a few years ago and asked the shop lady (age late ~20s), “do you have a Zorro costume?” She asked me, “What’s a Zorro?” Faaark I’m officially old!

      True story. Antonio Banderas then ran into the store, yelled “Oi!” and stormed out.

    • FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      I know, right? That was such a staple of aviation in general. Everybody knew about Concorde, just like how everyone can immediately recognise a Boeing 747. Maybe in thirty years time, some young’in will post about ‘I learned about an aircraft called a 747.’

      Concorde was such an icon, they even made an entire disaster movie featuring it, Airport ‘79:

      https://youtu.be/BdwoWbBduxw

      Not so fun fact: the aircraft used in the movie, F-BTSC, was also the actual Concorde that crashed in 2000, ultimately killing the type.

  • Skua@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    107
    ·
    5 months ago

    A fun fact about Concorde: there is one aerial photo of one of them flying at supersonic speeds, and the fighter jet that the photo was taken from could barely keep up long enough to take it. Here’s the pic.

    The image was taken by Adrian Meredith who was flying a Royal Air Force (RAF) Tornado jet during a rendezvous with the Concorde over the Irish Sea in April 1985. Although the Tornado could match Concorde’s cruising speed it could only do so for a matter of minutes due to the enormous rate of fuel consumption. Several attempts were made to take the photo, and eventually the Concorde had to slow down from Mach 2 to Mach 1.5-1.6 so that the Tornado crew could get the shot. The Tornado was stripped of everything to get it up to that speed as long as possible.

    https://theaviationgeekclub.com/heres-the-only-picture-of-concorde-flying-at-supersonic-speed/

      • Skua@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        5 months ago

        Probably would have had the same problem. Both the Tornado and the F-15 were capable of going fast enough, it’s just going fast enough for an extended period that becomes a problem. The F-15 is a bit faster but needs to carry a bunch of external fuel tanks to match the Tornado’s range. Neither of them is cruising the whole way across the Atlantic at more than mach 2 like Concorde could

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        5 months ago

        IIRC the only fighters that can supercruise (go supersonic without gushing fuel out of afterburners) are super modern jets like the F22, and still not at Mach 2.

        Some older specialized craft could go Mach 2 efficiently, like blackbird or the XB-70, but they’re all long retired.

        Concorde was realistically the only plane that could do that.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 months ago

          The SR-71 Blackbird is the closest thing I’ve seen to evidence that we had alien technology in the 60s. That thing is fucking wild. It doesn’t even look real in photos, it looks like mediocre cg

  • pelya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Time savings in today’s economics would be completely negated by waiting two hours in line at the airport.

  • chrisbtoo@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    5 months ago

    Thanks to Concorde, Phil Collins was able to play at both the London and Philadelphia Live Aid concerts. He Played in London, got a helicopter to Heathrow, Concorde to NY and then another helicopter to Philadelphia.

    • ParadoxSeahorse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      As well as his own set at both venues, he also played the piano for Sting in London, then drums for Eric Clapton, and played with the reuniting surviving members of Led Zeppelin at JFK. On the Concorde flight, Collins encountered actress and singer Cher and told her about the concerts. Upon reaching the US, she attended the Philadelphia concert and can be seen performing as part of the concert’s “We Are the World” finale.

      Love Cher just chilling on Concorde, might go to a gig

    • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      I also think it’s the younger folks who may not know what older folks already knew. OP was maybe too young to remember about Concorde.

      • ByteOnBikes@discuss.onlineOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Im nearing 40 and never knew about it because:

        1. Never had an interest in flying to Europe until recently
        2. Age is making me delete memories to store new ones
  • dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    5 months ago

    I remember fantasizing about flying in that thing when I was a kid. Not because it was a super luxury flight, only because it was supersonic. I was sad the day they mothballed it.

  • PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    5 months ago

    I lived under the Heathrow-Noo Yoik flight path, and every evening within a couple of minutes, there’d be a dull thud sound on the roof.

    By that point, the plane has reached a supersonic speed and the sonic boom was striking the ground in a reduced fashion. It just sounded like someone had dropped a bag of sand on the house.

    This was of course back before the days of ADSB tracking.

  • Tetsuo@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    5 months ago

    My grandpa was a mechanic on one of these. Impressive plane it’s too bad it didn’t work out.

    • jqubed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      A guy I worked with put himself through university working ground crew for Braniff at Dulles when they were flying interchange flights taking the Concorde on from Dulles to Dallas-Fort Worth. He commented on how crazy some of the tools were that the mechanics were regularly using while the plane was at the gate.

  • rizzothesmall@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    5 months ago

    I used to have outdoor PE up on a hill near the sea and we would hear the booms from Concorde out over the ocean. Takes me way back. Also makes me feel way old that someone old enough to write this didn’t already know about it lol

    They also occasionally took off and landed at a local airport and we would go and see them sometimes. Noise on takeoff is unimaginable unless you’ve witnessed something like a Typhoon jet. The kind of noise you can feel entirely through your body.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Concorde is cool as heck, but honestly, supersonic travel is fundamentally impractical.

    It’s kinda like space “colonization.” It’s a really cool dream, but once you take a hard look at the physics (never mind engineering, just assume that will be worked out), it just makes little sense outside of science missions or niches like that.


    And if it’s really urgent these days… teleconference. Or charter a private jet between closer airports.

    I think it would be cool to have one or a few SS passenger planes in operation for weird niches (medical emergencies? Charity? Political flights? Stuff like that,) but that’s about it.

    • Womble@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      It would make a lot more sense nowadays for Europe/NA to east Asia (or would for Europe if Russia were a reasonable country that could be trusted to fly over).

  • gramie@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    The former president of Zaire (now the Democratic Republic of the Congo) had a Concorde-capable airport built at his home village, so that his wife could charter it to go shopping in Europe.

    The CIA assassinated his predecessor and put him in power so that he would do their bidding and that of the American mining companies. It’s estimated that he was worth around $6 billion, $30-40 billion in today’s money.

  • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    5 months ago

    When flying supersonic the entire plane would expand and get longer to the point where flight engineer could put his hat between his console and bulkhead.

    However, when it slowed down and cooled the engineer had to remember to get his hat or it would be stuck in the shrunken space.

    The Concorde on display at the Udvar-Hazy Center had this happen, and it has a hat permanently stuck in the cockpit.

    (At least according to the tour guide.)