Recording on-duty law enforcement agents is protected by the First Amendment.

  • TuffNutzes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    5 months ago

    Just like running away from them and blocking their violent blows is “assaulting a federal officer”.

  • TwinTitans@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    This is not China, there are rules, and if you are not going to follow them, the people will force you to. Your identification does not get to remain hidden.

  • Ascrod@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 months ago

    Surveillance state masters don’t like when surveillance is used on them. Boo fucking hoo, drink your medicine.

  • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    you can’t “doxx” public servants. being able to identify public servants (especially ones with authority to arrest or bear extraordinary force against their fellow citizens) is kind of important. my wife is a mere teacher and you can fucking look up how much she’s paid by the district online. we don’t even get that much privacy, all because she’s a public employee. it’s the tradeoff. every public employee, it’s up there if you know where to look.

  • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    Recording on-duty law enforcement agents is protected by the First Amendment.

    *was