sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 1 month agoUnsealed: Spotify Lawsuit Triggered Anna's Archive Domain Name Suspensions * TorrentFreaktorrentfreak.comexternal-linkmessage-square58linkfedilinkarrow-up118arrow-down10cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up118arrow-down1external-linkUnsealed: Spotify Lawsuit Triggered Anna's Archive Domain Name Suspensions * TorrentFreaktorrentfreak.comsabreW4K3@lazysoci.al to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square58linkfedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-squareguy@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agoThis makes Anna’s archive a bit problematic with that logic since when you pay for a paper you get a PDF copy?
minus-squareArcka@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 month agoThese companies maintain that even though you possess a PDF, you still do not own it and do not have the rights associated with ownership.
minus-squareguy@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·29 days agoWell no, but in the same spirit of how you don’t own a movie just because you bought the DVD? I mean there are few things you actually own after buying them
minus-squareArcka@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·29 days agoI’m not sure what you’re buying, but I prioritize purchases of things I will actually own and therefore do own most of the things I buy.
minus-squareCenotaph@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoI would consider it more problematic if the author of the paper got any of that and not the journal the author had to pay to be published
minus-squarewolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·29 days agoNot when the vast majority of music rights holders are not the artists. Then it becomes a far more apt comparison.
minus-squareguy@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·28 days agoThat’s a question of compensation, not ownership in any case
This makes Anna’s archive a bit problematic with that logic since when you pay for a paper you get a PDF copy?
These companies maintain that even though you possess a PDF, you still do not own it and do not have the rights associated with ownership.
Well no, but in the same spirit of how you don’t own a movie just because you bought the DVD? I mean there are few things you actually own after buying them
I’m not sure what you’re buying, but I prioritize purchases of things I will actually own and therefore do own most of the things I buy.
I would consider it more problematic if the author of the paper got any of that and not the journal the author had to pay to be published
That’s a different point
Not when the vast majority of music rights holders are not the artists. Then it becomes a far more apt comparison.
That’s a question of compensation, not ownership in any case