• chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      17 小时前

      If became effective immediately, by the end of his term Trump would have installed 8 of the 9 justices on the Court, as Sotamayor and Kagan were both first-term Obama appointees.

      The last time this was discussed, the idea was to cycle them out every 2 years, starting with the longest-serving (Thomas) through the newest (Jackson).

      That would result in no change to the current partisan makeup during Trump’s term. If it were to take effect on January 1, he would get to change out Thomas and Roberts, with the next President getting Alito and Sotamayor in their first term, and Kagan and Gorsuch in their second.

      It would actually be ideal to wait until the next President (hopefully a Dem) if the goal was to restore balance, since the first 3 replacements seats were all Republican-appointed.

      Though what would actually happen is the Thomas, Alito, and Roberts would all resign and be replaced by new Republicans right before the law took effect so that the longest-remaining terms were all Republican-appointed when the law takes effect.

    • TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 天前

      I suspect this would only apply to justices going forward; even if this passed, we’re stuck with the current ppl.

      • davidgro@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        24 小时前

        Not the exact amendment that the article is about. It’s explicit that anyone over the limit is gone when it’s ratified.

        • tempest@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 天前

          Given the way the Democrats behave even if they were in power the Republicans would just have to complain that’s it’s 4 years too close to an election and the end result would be the same.