• pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 hours ago

    what does that have to do with decentralization? fuck cloud fare but is the argument that Lemmy instances shouldn’t try to protect their servers against attacks?

  • PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Well yeah… until frontends (instance) can be decentralized and requests sent to fragmented multiple hosts, this is how it works. One centralized frotend, connected to a more federated backend. Afaik, federation traffic should probably not go through cloudflare, but I’m no expert on that, maybe .world admins can comment.
    Use a different instance to access the network.

  • arudesalad@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Didn’t they start using cloudflare to protect against constant ddos attacks causing downtime? Out of both options, having downtime from external servers failing is less of a headache to the admins (they are volunteers, this is the most important factor) than having downtime from internal servers failing.

    • Danitos@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Yeah, it’s far better to have a once in a year downtime together with the whole internet than getting a constant DDOS.

        • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I’m a non-tech fl0pper. So what’s wrong with .world?

          There’s nothing wrong with it. Lots of folks pick one or more instances more central to their interests, after they get to know this place.

          It doesn’t make a huge difference.

          Some of us have noticed ourselves subscribed to a large number of communities from the same instance, and then creates an account there to check out their “local” feed and discover new communities.

          • luciferofastora@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Some of us have noticed ourselves subscribed to a large number of communities from the same instance, and then creates an account there to check out their “local” feed and discover new communities.

            In my case, it was useful for relevant local news.

            Also memes.

        • some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          It’s view-only when I have my VPN turned on, for starters. Other than that, it’s basically just reddit lite, that’s just vibes though. I’ve been here several months, and kinda know my way around, but don’t quite feel confident enough to join or start another instance. Still just getting the lay of the land, and - hey, I haven’t been banned yet! So the vpn stuff is the only real issue I’ve had so far.

        • MathematicalMagpie@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 hours ago

          It’s too popular, and having too many communities and users on one instance creates a problem when things like Cloudflare going down happens.

          • wowwoweowza@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Totally get it. I forget which site led me to Lemmy but the first instance I joined was .ml and from there I moved to .world

        • AtariDump@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          When you call out a user on some bullshit the mods get butthurt that you’re singling them out.

          Your idiotic disclaimer that you can use your messages for AI or using a “b” with a weird line on it isn’t going to do jack squat.

          Edit: Plus they block the piracy sub-whatevers.

          • wowwoweowza@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            I think I’ve seen the character you’re describing. I think my take away from this thread is I need to deepen my understanding here and broaden my experience.

  • ThePantser@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    ·
    21 hours ago

    sh.itjust.works was down too. I just switched instances which is the point. It’s not supposed to fail over, it just can’t be taken down because there are more instances. I sure wish my client could auto fail over to one of my other accounts grab posts though.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      sh.itjust.works was down too

      I sure wish my client could auto fail over to one of my other accounts grab posts though.

      I mean, in theory, the folks admining .world could create their own fail-over. But hosting costs money and redundancy costs even more money and this continues to be - at its heart - a labor of love by a handful of charitable admins, not an enterprise level app looking to maximize uptime for revenue.

      To get Fediverse to switch instances or substitute a working mirror, you’d have to pivot away from the inherently decentralized nature of the application. At a minimum, you’d need an endpoint that worked as a switch between communities.

      Like, its possible, in the same way Torrents have a single entry point that ties out to a semi-unreliable cluster of hosters. But it is not (to my knowledge) how Fediverse is currently designed.

    • Axolotl@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I never tried it so i don’t know: i can just login on another instance with my account made on the instance that is down?

      • bisby@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        21 hours ago

        No, but the fediverse doesn’t go down just because one instance is down.

        You would need multiple accounts (one per instance), but you could just switch instances if you had that set up

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    That’s why it’s called “federated” and nont “decentralized”

    Freenet/Hyphanet is I think too slow for modern internet users. P2P networks have always struggled with solving the service lookup and access problem.

    Even advancements like DHTs or cheat methods like trackers will still only get you so far compared to plain old client server DNS.

    • dohpaz42@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Bruh.

      While a traditional social networking service will host all its content on servers managed by the owner of the website, the decentralized structure of the Fediverse allows any individual or organization to host a social platform using their own servers…. [Source]

      (Emphasis mine)

        • dohpaz42@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Federation by its very nature is the very definition of decentralized. My best guess is that you’re conflating high availability (e.g. fail over servers, or round robin, or something else where when one server goes down, another kicks in as a backup but still on the same domain) with federation.

          ~No shade btw.~

  • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I like the centralized and understandable moderation of this larger space.

    The smaller communities are basically little fiefdoms where you can follow the rules, but if the mods still don’t like you, then you get banned with no appeal process.